We quote UV jobs. This page exists so a buyer can tell when that quote is the right one — and when a screen shop still wins the run. No invented break-even. No pretend screen line.
Request a Quote →Polyprint is a UV print shop. The search that lands people here is “uv printing vs screen printing.” That phrase is a buying decision, not a priced comparison table. We will quote the UV side: a digital file, UV-curable ink, cured on the part. We will not quote a screen, because we do not cut screens. If your job is a short run, a mixed-SKU run, or artwork that is photographic, gradient, or full color, UV is usually the quote you should ask us for. If your job is a very large run of one or two flat spot colors and you want a thick, opaque deposit, a screen shop is still the honest winner. This URL owns that fork. It does not own tumblers, glass panels, canvas, or how long a print lasts.
Mimaki’s own “Shifting from Screen printing to UV inkjet printing” page is the process fact we use, not a Polyprint house machine list. Screen printing uses a screen — a stencil plate — to apply layers of ink. A different stencil is used for each color, one at a time, combined to build the final look. Mimaki states it is possible to print on thick materials, glass, metal, and cloth this way, and also states it is not possible to use screen printing for subtle or gradation colors. Because each color needs its own stencil, the method is not written for low-volume, high-mix, quick-delivery work. Roland DG’s switch-from-screen note says the same thing in shop language: physical screens for each design, separate screens for each colour, and setup time that has to be paid before the first piece runs.
UV printing is a form of digital printing. Mimaki’s definition: ultraviolet light dries or cures the ink as it is printed, and curing is instant. Plateless digital printing uses the same data-out principle as a desktop printer, which is why it is effective for small-lot and multi-product production. There is no screen and no plate. The printhead jets UV-curable ink from the file; a UV lamp in the carriage polymerizes it. Mimaki’s UV-curable ink page adds the production fact that matters on a quote: the ink is cured and adhered by UV radiation, and the print is already dried when it comes out of the printer. That is why a one-off sample and a later production piece can share the same process path. We are using those OEM pages for the process. We are not publishing a catalog number as if one press covered every panel and every object.
Two more distinctions belong on other URLs, not here. UV is itself a category of digital printing, not a rival to “digital” — the curing step is what sets it apart from aqueous, solvent, or latex inkjet, and that lives on UV printing vs. digital printing. A deep recess, a pen barrel, or a molded pocket that a flat printhead cannot see is a pad-print geometry problem, not a screen-vs-UV cost problem; that lives on UV printing vs. pad printing. Transfer film that prints the graphic off the part and applies it as a decal is a third path, on UV DTF vs. direct UV printing.
Request a Quote →
This is a quote filter, not a contest. Send the artwork and the quantity per design. We will tell you which side of the line you are on.
Mimaki writes UV inkjet as the alternative to screen for low-volume, high-mix, on-demand work: no print-plate, print what you need when you need it, and a single sample that matches production quality. Roland adds the design reason: full-colour printing in a single pass, high-resolution images on wood, glass, metal, and other rigid faces, plus variable-data and limited-edition work that would force a new screen every time the file changes. Those are manufacturer claims about the process. They are the jobs we actually quote.
Roland is explicit that high-volume screen work can still absorb the stencil outlay. Mimaki never claims UV replaces every analog run. We will not claim it either. A screen shop still wins:
Two mistakes show up more than any others. The first is sending a “simple logo” that actually has a soft gradient, a photo, or fine type hiding in it to a screen shop, then wondering why it prints flat or banded. Mimaki’s screen description is the reason: the process is not written for subtle or gradation color. The second is sending a huge single-color run to a UV shop without ever pricing a screen bid at that exact quantity per design. We will still quote the UV side if you ask. We will also tell you when the artwork and the volume say a screen shop should bid it. Confirm quantity per design — not SKU count — and look at the file for anything beyond flat spot color before you lock a process.
Some production lines use both processes on purpose: a screen shop prints a large solid-color base, then a UV shop prints the variant, the store mark, or the limited design that would kill the screen cost advantage if a new stencil had to be cut every time. That split is common in packaging and promotional products, less common on architectural panels where one process usually covers the whole face. We can quote the UV pass. We cannot quote the screen pass. If your PO needs both, name which layer is ours. Do not ask us to pretend we also burned the screens.
The leftover Google Search Console query for this URL is a process compare. The old meta talked about setup cost and run length as if this page were a priced sheet. It is not.
Screen printing has a real setup step. A shop coats a mesh, exposes a stencil, registers it, and mixes a spot ink. Roland calls that expensive on small runs or multiple designs. Mimaki says the missing plate is why UV delivery time and cost drop on low-volume, high-mix work. Those are process statements. They are not a Polyprint price. We will not publish a per-screen dollar band, a per-piece UV rate, or a unit count where “screen becomes cheaper.” An earlier draft of this page used “low thousands of units” and a “1–1,000s / 1,000s+” run-length card as if those were house facts. They were not. Color count, who already owns the screens, white underbase, primer, clear coat, and mixed SKUs all move the line. The only crossover that exists is the one between our UV quote and a screen shop’s bid on your actual quantity per design.
What moves a UV number — substrate, coverage, finishing, rush — belongs on UV printing cost. What a small per-design run costs when there is no plate to amortize belongs on minimum order quantities. Spot-color matching against a book is a different conversation than “which process,” and that lives on color matching and Pantone. White ink as an opaque underbase on a dark or clear face is white ink and opaque underprinting. None of those pages are a screen-print price list either.
Durability is the other number we will not invent on a comparison URL. Mimaki USA’s UV-ink note says a photomechanical process turns the ink from a liquid to a solid on deposition, and that the cured film is water resistant and less likely to scratch than an uncured ink. That is chemistry, not a warranty. How long a print lasts, how you clean it, and whether outdoor exposure or a dishwasher is even the same question all live on UV printing durability and care and on the testing page. We will not hang a fade-year range or a house warranty on “UV vs screen.”
We quote from the file and the end use, not from the phrase “UV vs screen.” Send the list below and you get a real spec, or an honest send-away.
There is no plate or screen forcing a volume floor on the UV side, so a handful of units or a single sample is workable. The real cost at low volume is fixture setup and color work per substrate — a fixed cost on five pieces or five hundred. Batching several SKUs of the same material into one run is how that setup gets shared. We take US jobs through the same contact form as every other surface. Offices and phones are the Netherlands and Belgium numbers already on this site — we are not inventing a US plant or a US screen line for this page. If the job is a court or other sports surface, that belongs on Sports. If you are still choosing a substrate, start at the surfaces hub.
Qualitative process notes for the buying decision. Setup dollars, unit crossovers, fade years, and dishwasher or weather-hour scores are not on this URL. Weathering and care live on durability and care and the testing page.
UV prints from a digital file. Screen printing needs one physical stencil made per color before the first piece runs. That is process, not a dollar figure.
UV handles gradients and photographic art natively. Screen printing excels at flat, highly opaque spot colors with a thick deposit.
UV is the quote for mixed SKUs, samples, and files that will change. Screen still wins one simple mark at high volume.
Polyprint quotes the UV job. A screen shop quotes the stencil job. We will not bid a process we do not run.
This URL owns UV versus screen — when to ask us for a UV quote, and when a screen shop still wins. If the part or the lifespan question has its own page, use that page.
A promo kit that mixes pens, acrylic, and a panel is still a UV scheduling question, not a screen-vs-UV essay — that kit lives on UV printing on promotional products. The process choice for each face is made here first.
Neither is better in every case. UV digital printing is the quote we write when the artwork is full-color, photographic, or gradient; when designs change SKU to SKU; or when the run is not large enough to justify a screen shop cutting a stencil per color. Screen printing still wins a very large run of a single one- or two-color design when the buyer wants a thick, opaque, tactile ink deposit. The process, not a slogan, decides it.
We quote UV jobs. Polyprint is a UV print shop. We do not operate a screen-printing line, and this page is not a second shop pretending to bid both processes. If a screen shop is the honest winner — one or two flat spot colors at high volume, or a garment program — we will say so. You take that run to a screen shop. We will not invent a stencil price so we can keep the PO.
There is no honest house crossover we will publish. Screen printing pays for a physical screen per color before the first piece runs, so that setup is expensive on a short run and spreads out as volume rises. UV printing has no screens or plates, so the first piece and a later piece share the same process path. The cheaper process depends on color count, artwork, quantity per design, and the other shop's actual screen bid. We quote the UV side. We will not invent a break-even unit count.
For photographic, gradient, and multi-color artwork, UV is the more capable process: Mimaki writes that screen printing is not meant for subtle or gradation colors, and that UV inkjet has no color limit and prints full color and gradations in one digital pass. Screen printing still wins flat spot color when the buyer wants a thick, highly opaque, tactile deposit from a single stencil. Those are different ink films. Do not expect a UV inkjet pass to feel like a heavy plastisol hit, and do not expect a two-screen logo shop to reprint a photograph.
Durability is not a process trophy, and it is not a year range we will invent here. Cured UV ink is a bonded polymer film. Screen-printed ink can be equally durable, and a thicker screen deposit is sometimes specified for high-abrasion industrial work. How long either lasts depends on ink chemistry, substrate, coating, exposure, and cleaning. That conversation lives on UV printing durability and care and on the testing page. Send the environment with the RFQ if outdoor or abrasion is the reason you are comparing processes.
We will not publish a unit number. The old version of this page implied a low-thousands crossover as if it were a house fact. It is not. Color count, screen complexity, who already owns the screens, and what the UV job actually includes (white underbase, primer, clear coat, mixed SKUs) all move the line. Get a UV quote from us at your real quantity per design, and get a screen quote from a screen shop if the artwork is simple enough that they should bid. Compare those two numbers. That is the only reliable crossover. Request the UV quote here.
Some buyers do that split: a screen shop runs a large solid-color base, and a UV shop prints the SKU-specific or photographic layer that would force a new screen every time the art changes. We can quote the UV layer. We cannot quote the screen layer, because we do not run screens. If your product needs both, say which face or which pass is ours. Packaging and promo programs see this more than architectural panels, where one process usually covers the whole job.
Artwork (and whether it is flat spot color or has a photo, gradient, or fine type hiding in it), quantity of unique designs and of each design, substrate and finish, indoor or outdoor use, and whether the design will change again. Also say if a screen shop already bid the same job. Send those on the contact form. We will come back with a UV spec and price, or tell you the run still belongs on a screen press.
Manufacturer pages fetched before they were used. We do not treat their numbers, machine models, or marketing claims as a Polyprint house spec or a house price.
Send artwork, quantity per design, substrate, and whether the mark will change. We will come back with a UV spec and price — or tell you the run still belongs at a screen shop.